#Harrison mixbus review 2013 pro#
#Harrison mixbus review 2013 software#
#Harrison mixbus review 2013 series#

The real difference lies in the sound, as standard Mixbus is modeled after the overall sound of Harrison consoles while Mixbus 32C is end-to-end modeled after one specific console-the one owned (and still used) by Bruce SwedienВ to mix Thriller, Bad, and a ton of other records. 32C has more busses, but the overall feel and functionality is very similar. The two DAWs, Mixbus and Mixbus 32C, are for the most part similar. They have made it clear, in both literature and layout, that their goal is to more closely emulate the feel and sound of mixing on an analog console, and not a вЂњcontainer for pluginsвЂќ. With such a long history of console manufacturing, HarrisonвЂ™s stance on DAW construction is not surprising.

#Harrison mixbus review 2013 pro#

And there are definite critiques I have of Pro Tools that others probably think of as a cool feature. IвЂ™ve generally had good luck with Pro Tools in the past, but there have been issues, some of which were never solved. In the case of both DAWs, searching the forums when I encountered problems revealed a list of problems I never had. My primary DAW has always been Pro Tools, so all of my comparisons will be based around that. While their name may not be as famous as SSL or Neve, their consoles are in use in top film and music mixing studios around the world. The 90s heralded the introduction of their first digital console, and to this day Harrison continues to produce world-class consoles, both digital and analog. Through the 70s and early 80s Harrison continued to make analog consoles, including the first fully automated console. (For a sense of time and scale here, the first commercially available SSL console was released in 1976.)

#Harrison mixbus review 2013 series#

Their first analog console offering was the Series 32, released in 1975. As a company, Harrison has a long history and impressive pedigree. Both aim to bring a more analog and more human workflow to the DAW experience. With that in mind, HarrisonВ offers up a whole new type of DAW to add to your studio with their MixbusВ software, and with an alternate version, Mixbus 32C.

#Harrison mixbus review 2013 software#

(A moment that leaves you to wonder how many timing and phase relationships youвЂ™ve ever-so-slightly destroyed.)Д«ut in the modern studio business, can you really afford not to check out how the industry is changing and what other offerings are available? Plus, an extra DAW in your back pocket means that an inspired session will never fail because one piece of software does. ItвЂ™s a sobering moment when you realize, for instance, that the вЂњswitch screenвЂќ hotkey in one DAW is the вЂњnudge clip to the leftвЂќ hotkey in another. Stepping outside those bounds can be daunting.

When you become adept with any one DAW, it becomes a bit like a home office that you are used to and able to work quickly and confidently in. ItвЂ™s an entire studio environment with complex workflow possibilities and constraints alike. ItвЂ™s more than an editor and more than a processor. Writing a fair and complete review of an entire DAW is a daunting task, to say the least.ДЄ DAW is much more than just a recording device. Harrison applies the large format console aesthetic, workflow and mindset to their full-featured DAWs, Mixbus and Mixbus 32C.